[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFGYw7FjvZZpuznA@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:20:59 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: dt-bindings: ufs: Add sm8250, sm8350 compatible
strings
Hello Martin,
On 16-03-21, 21:21, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> Vinod,
>
> >> Document "qcom,sm8250-ufshc" and "qcom,sm8350-ufshc" compatible string.
> >> Use of "qcom,sm8250-ufshc" is already present upstream, so add misiing
> >> documentation. "qcom,sm8350-ufshc" is for UFS HC found in SM8350 SoC.
> >
> > Gentle reminder for this patch, Rob has acked this
>
> Was not really expecting a DT patch to be routed through SCSI. But no
> worries. I've queued it up.
Thank you. You can blame MAINTAINERS for pointing it to you :)
Typically DT binding go thru subsystem and dts thru soc trees
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists