lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202103171506.QmuR9fOs-lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:19:11 +0800
From:   kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/13] mm/mempolicy: huge-page allocation for many
 preferred

Hi Feng,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on linux/master]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.12-rc3]
[cannot apply to next-20210316]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Feng-Tang/Introduced-multi-preference-mempolicy/20210317-114204
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git a74e6a014c9d4d4161061f770c9b4f98372ac778
config: s390-randconfig-r022-20210317 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 13.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 8ef111222a3dd12a9175f69c3bff598c46e8bdf7)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3bfe0c833846b79ae8bbfff60906c9d7c244c3b8
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Feng-Tang/Introduced-multi-preference-mempolicy/20210317-114204
        git checkout 3bfe0c833846b79ae8bbfff60906c9d7c244c3b8
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross ARCH=s390 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
           ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
                              ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:19:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
           (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x000000ffUL) << 24) |            \
                     ^
   In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
           ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
                              ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:20:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
           (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x0000ff00UL) <<  8) |            \
                     ^
   In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
           ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
                              ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:21:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
           (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0x00ff0000UL) >>  8) |            \
                     ^
   In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:119:21: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
           ___constant_swab32(x) :                 \
                              ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:22:12: note: expanded from macro '___constant_swab32'
           (((__u32)(x) & (__u32)0xff000000UL) >> 24)))
                     ^
   In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:34:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:120:12: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
           __fswab32(x))
                     ^
   In file included from mm/hugetlb.c:19:
   In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:14:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:80:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                      ^~~~
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:61: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                               ^~~~
>> mm/hugetlb.c:1129:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:86: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                                                        ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:69:3: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_value'
           (cond) ?                                        \
            ^~~~
   mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:52: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                      ^~~~
   mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:61: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                               ^~~~
   mm/hugetlb.c:1896:12: error: no member named 'mode' in 'struct mempolicy'
           if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
               ~~~~  ^
   include/linux/compiler.h:56:47: note: expanded from macro 'if'
   #define if(cond, ...) if ( __trace_if_var( !!(cond , ## __VA_ARGS__) ) )
                                                 ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:58:86: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_var'
   #define __trace_if_var(cond) (__builtin_constant_p(cond) ? (cond) : __trace_if_value(cond))
                                                                                        ^~~~
   include/linux/compiler.h:69:3: note: expanded from macro '__trace_if_value'
           (cond) ?                                        \
            ^~~~
   20 warnings and 6 errors generated.


vim +1129 mm/hugetlb.c

  1102	
  1103	static struct page *dequeue_huge_page_vma(struct hstate *h,
  1104					struct vm_area_struct *vma,
  1105					unsigned long address, int avoid_reserve,
  1106					long chg)
  1107	{
  1108		struct page *page = NULL;
  1109		struct mempolicy *mpol;
  1110		gfp_t gfp_mask;
  1111		nodemask_t *nodemask;
  1112		int nid;
  1113	
  1114		/*
  1115		 * A child process with MAP_PRIVATE mappings created by their parent
  1116		 * have no page reserves. This check ensures that reservations are
  1117		 * not "stolen". The child may still get SIGKILLed
  1118		 */
  1119		if (!vma_has_reserves(vma, chg) &&
  1120				h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
  1121			goto err;
  1122	
  1123		/* If reserves cannot be used, ensure enough pages are in the pool */
  1124		if (avoid_reserve && h->free_huge_pages - h->resv_huge_pages == 0)
  1125			goto err;
  1126	
  1127		gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h);
  1128		nid = huge_node(vma, address, gfp_mask, &mpol, &nodemask);
> 1129		if (mpol->mode != MPOL_BIND && nodemask) { /* AKA MPOL_PREFERRED_MANY */
  1130			gfp_t gfp_mask1 = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
  1131	
  1132			gfp_mask1 &= ~__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM;
  1133			page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h,
  1134					gfp_mask1, nid, nodemask);
  1135			if (!page)
  1136				page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, NULL);
  1137		} else {
  1138			page = dequeue_huge_page_nodemask(h, gfp_mask, nid, nodemask);
  1139		}
  1140		if (page && !avoid_reserve && vma_has_reserves(vma, chg)) {
  1141			SetHPageRestoreReserve(page);
  1142			h->resv_huge_pages--;
  1143		}
  1144	
  1145		mpol_cond_put(mpol);
  1146		return page;
  1147	
  1148	err:
  1149		return NULL;
  1150	}
  1151	

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (14937 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ