linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] rtc: rx6110: add ACPI bindings to I2C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5296791f-c432-d769-390a-27f86d4d1ae8@denx.de>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 08:53:15 +0100
From:   Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     johannes hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        werner zeh <werner.zeh@...mens.com>,
        henning schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>,
        martin mantel <martin.mantel@...mens.com>,
        val krutov <val.krutov@....epson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] rtc: rx6110: add ACPI bindings to I2C

Hi Andy,

On 2021-03-16 17:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 03:48:18PM +0100, Claudius Heine wrote:
>> From: Johannes Hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>
>>
>> This allows the RX6110 driver to be automatically assigned to the right
>> device on the I2C bus.
> 
> You missed given tag, when somebody sends you one, it's usually your
> responsibility to pick it up. Hint: install b4 tool (likely in your distro, at
> least Debian, Arch Linux have it) and run it against message ID of the version
> in question. It will gather all tags. For example, for this case, run
> 
>    % b4 am 20210316144819.4130622-1-ch@...x.de
> 
> It will download mailbox suitable for `git am ...` you will read on the screen.
> 
> Also, when send a new version, don't attach it to the old thread. It will
> confuse people and maybe even tools (i.o.w. don't supply message ID to be put
> to In-Reply-To header).

Ok.

> 
> So, repeat again my tag and see one fix to be performed below.
> Reviewed-by: From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>

Ok, will take care about this in v5.

> 
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c
>> index 79161d4c6ce4..2a06953c0a84 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rx6110.c
>> @@ -447,6 +447,12 @@ static int rx6110_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>   	return rx6110_probe(rx6110, &client->dev);
>>   }
>>   
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id rx6110_i2c_acpi_match[] = {
>> +	{ "SECC6110" },
>> +	{ }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, rx6110_i2c_acpi_match);
>> +
>>   static const struct i2c_device_id rx6110_i2c_id[] = {
>>   	{ "rx6110", 0 },
>>   	{ }
>> @@ -456,6 +462,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, rx6110_i2c_id);
>>   static struct i2c_driver rx6110_i2c_driver = {
>>   	.driver = {
>>   		.name = RX6110_DRIVER_NAME,
>> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(rx6110_i2c_acpi_match),
> 
> Since you drop ifdeffery above, you have to drop ACPI_PTR() (besides that
> ACPI_PTR() requires acpi.h to be included).

Ok, will do that as well.

regards,
Claudius