linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] media/videobuf1|2: Mark follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:04:50 +0100
From:   Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        "J??r??me Glisse" <jglisse@...hat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Pawel Osciak <pawel@...iak.com>,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>,
        Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] media/videobuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 8:22 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 04:52:44PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > My understanding is mostly, but with some objections. And I kinda
> > don't want to let this die in a bikeshed and then not getting rid of
> > follow_pfn as a result. There's enough people who acked this, and the
> > full removal got some nack from Mauro iirc.
>
> Hmm, ok I must have missed that.  I defintively prefer your series over
> doing nothing, but killing the dead horse ASAP would be even better.

I have a bunch of slow-burner things I need to fix in this area of
driver mmaps vs get_user_/follow_ conflicts anyway, I'll add a note to
put the horse out of it's misery in due time. We have a few problems
still where things might get pinned or used where it really shouldn't
be.

Can I count that as an ack on the series? You've touched this quite a
bit recently.

Thanks, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch