linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 33/36] KVM: arm64: Wrap the host with a stage 2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 09:02:09 +0000
From:   Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To:     Mate Toth-Pal <mate.toth-pal@....com>
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, maz@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com,
        suzuki.poulose@....com, android-kvm@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, tabba@...gle.com, ardb@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, dbrazdil@...gle.com, nd@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 33/36] KVM: arm64: Wrap the host with a stage 2

On Wednesday 17 Mar 2021 at 09:41:09 (+0100), Mate Toth-Pal wrote:
> On 2021-03-16 18:46, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > On Tuesday 16 Mar 2021 at 16:16:18 (+0100), Mate Toth-Pal wrote:
> > > On 2021-03-16 15:29, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday 16 Mar 2021 at 12:53:53 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday 16 Mar 2021 at 13:28:42 (+0100), Mate Toth-Pal wrote:
> > > > > > Changing the value of MT_S2_FWB_NORMAL to 7 would change this behavior, and
> > > > > > the resulting memory type would be device.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Sounds like the correct fix here -- see below.
> > > > 
> > > > Just to clarify this, I meant this should be the configuration for the
> > > > host stage-2. We'll want to keep the existing behaviour for guests I
> > > > believe.
> > > 
> > > I Agree.
> > 
> > OK, so the below seems to boot on my non-FWB-capable hardware and should
> > fix the issue. Could you by any chance give it a spin?
> > 
> 
> Sure, I can give it a go. I was trying to apply the patch on top of https://android-kvm.googlesource.com/linux/+/refs/heads/qperret/host-stage2-v5
> but it seems that your base is significantly different. Can you give some
> hints what should I use as base?

Oh interesting, it _should_ apply on v5. I just pushed a branch with
everything applied if that helps:

  https://android-kvm.googlesource.com/linux qperret/wip/fix-fwb-host-stage2

Thanks again!
Quentin