linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] rtc: rx6110: add ACPI bindings to I2C

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3215fc7e-ae1d-4e51-51d0-24ff386419bd@denx.de>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 10:32:39 +0100
From:   Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     johannes hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        "open list:REAL TIME CLOCK (RTC) SUBSYSTEM" 
        <linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        werner zeh <werner.zeh@...mens.com>,
        henning schild <henning.schild@...mens.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
        martin mantel <martin.mantel@...mens.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] rtc: rx6110: add ACPI bindings to I2C

Hi Andy,

On 2021-03-17 10:28, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:56 AM Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de> wrote:
>>
>> From: Johannes Hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>
>>
>> This allows the RX6110 driver to be automatically assigned to the right
>> device on the I2C bus.
> 
> Thanks for an update!
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Hahn <johannes-hahn@...mens.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudius Heine <ch@...x.de>
>> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> 
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> This is usually for patches that do fix found problems, here it's a
> completely new item and the report was done in the middle of the
> development. That said, you may give credit to LKP by just mentioning
> it in the comments section (after the cutter '---' line). I'll leave
> this to Alexandre and Alessandro to decide if you need a resend or
> they may remove it when applying. (In my opinion resend is not needed
> right now)
Ok. Thanks a lot for your reviews and patience!

regards,
Claudius