lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210317095401.1854544-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 15:24:01 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rdunlap@...radead.org, Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel: trace: Mundane typo fixes in the file trace_events_filter.c


s/callin/calling/
s/progam/program/
s/interperate/interpret/

Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
index e91259f6a722..49de3e21e9bc 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ enum {
  * is "&&" we don't call update_preds(). Instead continue to "c". As the
  * next token after "c" is not "&&" but the end of input, we first process the
  * "&&" by calling update_preds() for the "&&" then we process the "||" by
- * callin updates_preds() with the values for processing "||".
+ * calling updates_preds() with the values for processing "||".
  *
  * What does that mean? What update_preds() does is to first save the "target"
  * of the program entry indexed by the current program entry's "target"
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ enum {
  * and "FALSE" the program entry after that, we are now done with the first
  * pass.
  *
- * Making the above "a || b && c" have a progam of:
+ * Making the above "a || b && c" have a program of:
  *  prog[0] = { "a", 1, 2 }
  *  prog[1] = { "b", 0, 2 }
  *  prog[2] = { "c", 0, 3 }
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ enum {
  * F: return FALSE
  *
  * As "r = a; if (!r) goto n5;" is obviously the same as
- * "if (!a) goto n5;" without doing anything we can interperate the
+ * "if (!a) goto n5;" without doing anything we can interpret the
  * program as:
  * n1: if (!a) goto n5;
  * n2: if (!b) goto n5;
--
2.30.2

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ