lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:06:21 +0300
From:   Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     thierry.reding@...il.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        balbi@...nel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, digetx@...il.com,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: ralink: define stubs for clk_set_parent to fix
 compile testing

On 17.03.2021 12:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

[...]
>>> The Ralink MIPS platform does not use Common Clock Framework and does
>>> not define certain clock operations leading to compile test failures:
>>>
>>>       /usr/bin/mips-linux-gnu-ld: drivers/usb/phy/phy-tegra-usb.o: in function `tegra_usb_phy_init':
>>>       phy-tegra-usb.c:(.text+0x1dd4): undefined reference to `clk_get_parent'
>>>
>>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/mips/ralink/clk.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c b/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>>> index 2f9d5acb38ea..8387177a47ef 100644
>>> --- a/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>>> +++ b/arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
>>> @@ -70,6 +70,20 @@ long clk_round_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate)
>>>    }
>>>    EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_round_rate);
>>>    
>>> +int clk_set_parent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *parent)
>>> +{
>>> +	WARN_ON(clk);
>>> +	return -1;
>>
>>      Shouldn't this be a proepr error code (-1 corresponds to -EPRERM)?
> 
> Could be ENODEV or EINVAL but all other stubs here and in ar7/clock.c
> use -1. Do you prefer it then to have it inconsistent with others?

    No. :-)

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

MBR, Sergei

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ