linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] media: uvcvideo: Check controls flags before accessing them

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6f6c59b-f55f-4415-13ee-dca777ed44ab@xs4all.nl>
Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 11:50:18 +0100
From:   Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
To:     Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        tfiga@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] media: uvcvideo: Check controls flags before
 accessing them

On 16/03/2021 18:59, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> We can figure out if reading/writing a set of controls can fail without
> accessing them by checking their flags.
> 
> This way we can honor the API closer:
> 
> If an error is found when validating the list of controls passed with
> VIDIOC_G_EXT_CTRLS, then error_idx shall be set to ctrls->count to
> indicate to userspace that no actual hardware was touched.
> 
> Fixes v4l2-compliance:
> Control ioctls (Input 0):
> 		warn: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(765): g_ext_ctrls(0) invalid error_idx 0
>                 fail: v4l2-test-controls.cpp(645): invalid error index write only control
>         test VIDIOC_G/S/TRY_EXT_CTRLS: FAIL
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
> ---
>  drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> index 157310c0ca87..e956d833ed84 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/usb/uvc/uvc_v4l2.c
> @@ -1040,31 +1040,54 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_ctrl(struct file *file, void *fh,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int uvc_ioctl_g_ext_ctrls(struct file *file, void *fh,
> -				 struct v4l2_ext_controls *ctrls)
> +static int uvc_ctrl_check_access(struct uvc_video_chain *chain,
> +				 struct v4l2_ext_controls *ctrls, bool read)
>  {
> -	struct uvc_fh *handle = fh;
> -	struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
>  	struct v4l2_ext_control *ctrl = ctrls->controls;
>  	unsigned int i;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
> -	if (ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < ctrls->count; ++ctrl, ++i) {
> -			struct v4l2_queryctrl qc = { .id = ctrl->id };
> +	for (i = 0; i < ctrls->count; ++ctrl, ++i) {
> +		struct v4l2_queryctrl qc = { .id = ctrl->id };
>  
> -			ret = uvc_query_v4l2_ctrl(chain, &qc);
> -			if (ret < 0) {
> -				ctrls->error_idx = i;
> -				return ret;
> -			}
> +		ret = uvc_query_v4l2_ctrl(chain, &qc);

You can't call this. If I am not mistaken, this call can actually call
the hardware.

Instead you need to call the lower level function uvc_find_control() and
use ctrl->info to check for read/write only.

> +		if (ret < 0)
> +			break;
>  
> +		if (ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL) {
>  			ctrl->value = qc.default_value;

This needs to use the old code in uvc_ioctl_g_ext_ctrls() since it depends
on uvc_query_v4l2_ctrl() which accesses the hardware.

> +			continue;
>  		}
>  
> -		return 0;
> +		if (qc.flags & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_WRITE_ONLY && read) {
> +			ret = -EACCES;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (qc.flags & V4L2_CTRL_FLAG_READ_ONLY && !read) {
> +			ret = -EACCES;
> +			break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  
> +	ctrls->error_idx = ctrls->count;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

So uvc_ctrl_check_access() is a good idea, but it does a bit too much.
It should just check if all controls in the list are known and check for
write/read only.

Regards,

	Hans

> +
> +static int uvc_ioctl_g_ext_ctrls(struct file *file, void *fh,
> +				 struct v4l2_ext_controls *ctrls)
> +{
> +	struct uvc_fh *handle = fh;
> +	struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
> +	struct v4l2_ext_control *ctrl = ctrls->controls;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = uvc_ctrl_check_access(chain, ctrls, true);
> +	if (ret < 0 || ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL)
> +		return ret;
> +
>  	ret = uvc_ctrl_begin(chain);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1092,10 +1115,6 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_try_ext_ctrls(struct uvc_fh *handle,
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	/* Default value cannot be changed */
> -	if (ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	ret = uvc_ctrl_begin(chain);
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
> @@ -1121,6 +1140,16 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_s_ext_ctrls(struct file *file, void *fh,
>  				 struct v4l2_ext_controls *ctrls)
>  {
>  	struct uvc_fh *handle = fh;
> +	struct uvc_video_chain *chain = handle->chain;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	/* Default value cannot be changed */
> +	if (ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	ret = uvc_ctrl_check_access(chain, ctrls, false);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
>  
>  	return uvc_ioctl_s_try_ext_ctrls(handle, ctrls, true);
>  }
> @@ -1130,6 +1159,10 @@ static int uvc_ioctl_try_ext_ctrls(struct file *file, void *fh,
>  {
>  	struct uvc_fh *handle = fh;
>  
> +	/* Default value cannot be changed */
> +	if (ctrls->which == V4L2_CTRL_WHICH_DEF_VAL)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	return uvc_ioctl_s_try_ext_ctrls(handle, ctrls, false);
>  }
>  
>