[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <302bb00b-df7b-970a-1c47-b48a56c7a526@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 11:19:56 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rppt@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, will@...nel.org, maobibo@...ngson.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Few spelling fixes
On 3/17/21 11:58 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> Few spelling fixes throughout the file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/pgtable.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> index 5e772392a379..4fcefd553a5c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> @@ -852,7 +852,7 @@ static inline void __ptep_modify_prot_commit(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> * updates, but to prevent any updates it may make from being lost.
> *
> * This does not protect against other software modifications of the
> - * pte; the appropriate pte lock must be held over the transation.
> + * pte; the appropriate pte lock must be held over the transition.
I think that should be transaction.
> *
> * Note that this interface is intended to be batchable, meaning that
> * ptep_modify_prot_commit may not actually update the pte, but merely
Other changes are OK.
--
~Randy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists