linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at TASK_FRAME and EL0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 18:26:07 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, jthierry@...hat.com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/8] arm64: Terminate the stack trace at
 TASK_FRAME and EL0_FRAME

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 11:57:55AM -0500, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com wrote:

> +	/* Terminal record, nothing to unwind */
> +	if (fp == (unsigned long) regs->stackframe) {
> +		if (regs->frame_type == TASK_FRAME ||
> +		    regs->frame_type == EL0_FRAME)
> +			return -ENOENT;
>  		return -EINVAL;
> +	}

This is conflating the reliable stacktrace checks (which your series
will later flag up with frame->reliable) with verifying that we found
the bottom of the stack by looking for this terminal stack frame record.
For the purposes of determining if the unwinder got to the bottom of the
stack we don't care what stack type we're looking at, we just care if it
managed to walk to this defined final record.  

At the minute nothing except reliable stack trace has any intention of
checking the specific return code but it's clearer to be consistent.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)