linux-kernel - Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210318193316.GS13911@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:33:16 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dgilbert@...erlog.com, hare@...e.de, mcgrof@...nel.org
Subject: Re: blktests: block/009 next-20210304 failure rate average of 1/448

On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 06:47:39PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 05:46:45PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > I've managed to reproduce blktests block/009 failures with kdevops [0]
> > on linux-next tag next-20210304 with a current failure rate average of
> > 1/448 (3 counted failures so far).
> 
> Confirmed on next-20210316 with current failure rate at 1/1008

Just in case this was a scsi_debug issue instead (I am covering that
prospect on another bug just for scsi_debug korg#212337 [0]) I tried
a userspace solution based on what I have observed I still can reproduce
this block/009 failure. The failure rate is much lower though, I have it
now at 1/1705 but alas it is still failing.

[0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212337

The patch below demonstrates the exra settle work for scsi_debug
attempted, and with it, this is still failing. So either the settle
work needs *more* effort, or this is a real issue.

diff --git a/common/scsi_debug b/common/scsi_debug
index b48cdc9..ecdbcc6 100644
--- a/common/scsi_debug
+++ b/common/scsi_debug
@@ -8,13 +8,42 @@ _have_scsi_debug() {
 	_have_modules scsi_debug
 }
 
+# As per korg#212337 [0] we must do more work in userspace to settle
+# scsi_debug devices a bit more carefully.
+
+# [0] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212337
+_settle_scsi_debug_device() {
+	SCSI_DEBUG_MAX_WAIT=10
+	SCSI_DEBUG_COUNT_WAIT_LOOP=0
+	while true ; do
+		if [[ -b $1 ]]; then
+			SCSI_DEBUG_LSOF_COUNT=$(lsof $1 | wc -l)
+			if [[ $SCSI_DEBUG_LSOF_COUNT -ne 0 ]]; then
+				sleep 1;
+			else
+				break
+			fi
+		else
+			# Let device come up
+			sleep 1
+
+			let SCSI_DEBUG_COUNT_WAIT_LOOP=$SCSI_DEBUG_COUNT_WAIT_LOOP+1
+			if [[ $SCSI_DEBUG_COUNT_WAIT_LOOP -ge $SCSI_DEBUG_MAX_WAIT ]]; then
+				break
+			fi
+		fi
+	done
+}
+
 _init_scsi_debug() {
 	if ! modprobe -r scsi_debug || ! modprobe scsi_debug "$@"; then
 		return 1
 	fi
-
 	udevadm settle
 
+	# Allow dependencies to load
+	sleep 1
+
 	local host_sysfs host target_sysfs target
 	SCSI_DEBUG_HOSTS=()
 	SCSI_DEBUG_TARGETS=()
@@ -43,6 +72,10 @@ _init_scsi_debug() {
 		return 1
 	fi
 
+	for i in $SCSI_DEBUG_DEVICES ; do
+		_settle_scsi_debug_device /dev/$i
+	done
+
 	return 0
 }