[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210318043656.GA26988@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:36:56 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kmap_local semantics
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:44:20PM -0700, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Agreed. I'm Sorry, I did not word the above clearly enough. Let me rephrase
> that.
>
> Christoph, do you anticipate additional need to call kmap and hand the mappings
> to other threads? If not then kmap_local is what you should use. If so, I'd
> like to know why.
No. Just looking into callers that want a mapping and then synchronously
wait for I/O.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists