lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd7acdcd-2bbc-70f5-d7a6-76a269e8f6a7@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 16:04:41 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Erik Rosen <erik.rosen@...ormote.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] hwmon: (pmbus/tps53679) Add support for TPS53676

On 3/18/21 2:24 PM, Erik Rosen wrote:
> Add support for TI TPS53676 controller to the tps53679 pmbus driver
> 
> The driver uses the USER_DATA_03 register to figure out how many phases are
> enabled and to which channel they are assigned, and sets the number of pages

checkpatch complains about the line length here. Picky, but just move pages
to the next line.

> and phases accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erik Rosen <erik.rosen@...ormote.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/hwmon/tps53679.rst | 13 +++++++--
>  drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig      |  4 +--
>  drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c   | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/tps53679.rst b/Documentation/hwmon/tps53679.rst
> index c7c589e49789..3b9561648c24 100644
> --- a/Documentation/hwmon/tps53679.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/tps53679.rst
> @@ -19,6 +19,14 @@ Supported chips:
>  
>      Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/TPS53667
>  
> +  * Texas Instruments TPS53676
> +
> +    Prefix: 'tps53676'
> +
> +    Addresses scanned: -
> +
> +    Datasheet: https://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/TPS53676
> +
>    * Texas Instruments TPS53679
>  
>      Prefix: 'tps53679'
> @@ -136,7 +144,7 @@ power1_input		Measured input power.
>  power[N]_label		"pout[1-2]".
>  
>  			- TPS53647, TPS53667: N=2
> -			- TPS53679, TPS53681, TPS53588: N=2,3
> +			- TPS53676, TPS53679, TPS53681, TPS53588: N=2,3
>  
>  power[N]_input		Measured output power.
>  
> @@ -156,10 +164,11 @@ curr[N]_label		"iout[1-2]" or "iout1.[0-5]".
>  
>  			The first digit is the output channel, the second
>  			digit is the phase within the channel. Per-phase
> -			telemetry supported on TPS53681 only.
> +			telemetry supported on TPS53676 and TPS53681 only.
>  
>  			- TPS53647, TPS53667: N=2
>  			- TPS53679, TPS53588: N=2,3
> +			- TPS53676: N=2-8
>  			- TPS53681: N=2-9
>  
>  curr[N]_input		Measured output current.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> index 32d2fc850621..35956a9227d8 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/Kconfig
> @@ -257,10 +257,10 @@ config SENSORS_TPS40422
>  	  be called tps40422.
>  
>  config SENSORS_TPS53679
> -	tristate "TI TPS53647, TPS53667, TPS53679, TPS53681, TPS53688"
> +	tristate "TI TPS53647, TPS53667, TPS53676, TPS53679, TPS53681, TPS53688"
>  	help
>  	  If you say yes here you get hardware monitoring support for TI
> -	  TPS53647, TPS53667, TPS53679, TPS53681, and TPS53688.
> +	  TPS53647, TPS53667, TPS53676, TPS53679, TPS53681, and TPS53688.
>  
>  	  This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
>  	  be called tps53679.
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
> index ba838fa311c3..d8e5f71ff162 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/tps53679.c
> @@ -16,11 +16,14 @@
>  #include "pmbus.h"
>  
>  enum chips {
> -	tps53647, tps53667, tps53679, tps53681, tps53688
> +	tps53647, tps53667, tps53676, tps53679, tps53681, tps53688
>  };
>  
>  #define TPS53647_PAGE_NUM		1
>  
> +#define TPS53676_USER_DATA_03		0xb3
> +#define TPS53676_MAX_PHASES		7
> +
>  #define TPS53679_PROT_VR12_5MV		0x01 /* VR12.0 mode, 5-mV DAC */
>  #define TPS53679_PROT_VR12_5_10MV	0x02 /* VR12.5 mode, 10-mV DAC */
>  #define TPS53679_PROT_VR13_10MV		0x04 /* VR13.0 mode, 10-mV DAC */
> @@ -143,6 +146,43 @@ static int tps53681_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
>  					    TPS53681_DEVICE_ID);
>  }
>  
> +static int tps53676_identify(struct i2c_client *client,
> +			     struct pmbus_driver_info *info)
> +{
> +	u8 buf[I2C_SMBUS_BLOCK_MAX];
> +	int phases_a = 0, phases_b = 0;
> +	int i, ret;
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, PMBUS_IC_DEVICE_ID, buf);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (strncmp("TI\x53\x67\x60", buf, 5)) {

Someone should have a serious talk with the chip designer.

> +		dev_err(&client->dev, "Unexpected device ID: %s\n", buf);
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = i2c_smbus_read_block_data(client, TPS53676_USER_DATA_03, buf);
> +	if (ret < 0)
> +		return ret;

You'll probably want to add a check to ensure that ret >= TPS53676_MAX_PHASES * 2 + 1
or maybe == 24.

> +	for (i = 0; i < 2 * TPS53676_MAX_PHASES; i += 2) {
> +		if (buf[i + 1] & 0x80) {
> +			if (buf[i] & 0x08)
> +				phases_b++;
> +			else
> +				phases_a++;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	info->format[PSC_VOLTAGE_OUT] = linear;
> +	info->pages = 1;
> +	info->phases[0] = phases_a;
> +	if (phases_b > 0) {
> +		info->pages = 2;
> +		info->phases[1] = phases_b;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int tps53681_read_word_data(struct i2c_client *client, int page,
>  				   int phase, int reg)
>  {
> @@ -183,6 +223,7 @@ static struct pmbus_driver_info tps53679_info = {
>  	.pfunc[3] = PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT,
>  	.pfunc[4] = PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT,
>  	.pfunc[5] = PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT,
> +	.pfunc[6] = PMBUS_HAVE_IOUT,
>  };
>  
>  static int tps53679_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> @@ -206,6 +247,9 @@ static int tps53679_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  		info->pages = TPS53647_PAGE_NUM;
>  		info->identify = tps53679_identify;
>  		break;
> +	case tps53676:
> +		info->identify = tps53676_identify;
> +		break;
>  	case tps53679:
>  	case tps53688:
>  		info->pages = TPS53679_PAGE_NUM;
> @@ -227,9 +271,11 @@ static int tps53679_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
>  static const struct i2c_device_id tps53679_id[] = {
>  	{"tps53647", tps53647},
>  	{"tps53667", tps53667},
> +	{"tps53676", tps53676},
>  	{"tps53679", tps53679},
>  	{"tps53681", tps53681},
>  	{"tps53688", tps53688},
> +	{"bmr474", tps53676},

Please move to the top for alphabetic order.

>  	{}
>  };
>  
> @@ -238,6 +284,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, tps53679_id);
>  static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused tps53679_of_match[] = {
>  	{.compatible = "ti,tps53647", .data = (void *)tps53647},
>  	{.compatible = "ti,tps53667", .data = (void *)tps53667},
> +	{.compatible = "ti,tps53676", .data = (void *)tps53676},
>  	{.compatible = "ti,tps53679", .data = (void *)tps53679},
>  	{.compatible = "ti,tps53681", .data = (void *)tps53681},
>  	{.compatible = "ti,tps53688", .data = (void *)tps53688},
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ