[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <282490.1616047333@turing-police>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 02:02:13 -0400
From: "Valdis Klētnieks" <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] gcc-plugins: avoid errors with -std=gnu++11 on old gcc
On Wed, 17 Mar 2021 22:52:56 -0700, Kees Cook said:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 03:40:21AM -0500, Valdis Kl��tnieks wrote:
> > It turns out that older gcc (4.9 and 5.4) have gnu++11 support, but
> > due to a gcc bug fixed in gcc6, throw errors during the build.
> > The relevant gcc bug is https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69959
> >
> > Version the option based on what gcc we're using.
>
> Is there a better way to detect this than with version checking?
Not really. gcc 11 needs --std=gnu++11 to build it. And although
gcc4 and gcc5 *claim* to support it, there's a known bug, so we *can't*
feed gnu++11 to them. We can check versions..
Or heave gcc-plugins over the side entirely..
Or declare that gcc6 is the minimum for building the kernel.
But if we support gcc4/5 *and* gcc11 to build gcc-plugins, we have to version-check.
(Unrelated - the patch has grown a merge conflict since I sent it, let me
know if you want an updated one, or if it's OK as is....
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists