[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFLrLwjZubWUvA2J@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:54:55 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] alpha: use libata instead of the legacy ide driver
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:56:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Switch the alpha defconfig from the legacy ide driver to libata.
Umm... I don't have an IDE alpha box in a usable shape (fans on
CPU module shat themselves), and it would take a while to resurrect
it, but I remember the joy it used to cause in some versions.
Do you have reports of libata variants of drivers actually tested on
those?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists