[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210318004614.thfvkh3oickkgk4q@treble>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2021 19:46:14 -0500
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>, x86@...nel.org, jgross@...e.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] objtool: Add elf_create_undef_symbol()
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:13:43PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:52:23PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
>
> > > + if (!elf_symbol_add(elf, sym, SHN_XINDEX)) {
> > > + WARN("elf_symbol_add");
> > > + return NULL;
> > > + }
> >
> > SHN_XINDEX means that the extended section index is used. Above you seem
> > to use it in the opposite sense too (assigning to shndx when shndx_data is
> > NULL). While it makes the code easier to handle, it is a bit confusing
> > (and maybe I am just confused now). Could you add a comment about that,
> > please? elf_symbol_add() seems like a good place.
>
> Yes, that was a horrible thing to do :/ And you understood it right.
>
> Looking at it again, I'm not sure it is actually correct tho; shouldn't
> elf_create_undef_symbol() also look at gelf_getsymshndx() of symtab ?
>
> What toolchain generates these extended sections and how? That is, how
> do I test this crud..
SHN_XINDEX is basically a special-case extension to original ELF for
supporting more than 64k sections.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists