linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] objtool,static_call: Don't emit static_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFMIcWIbk0aN30NY@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:59:45 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>,
        Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@...el.com>, jbaron@...mai.com,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] objtool,static_call: Don't emit static_call_site for
 .exit.text

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 07:02:12PM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 01:45:57PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > arguably it simply isn't a good idea to use static_call() in __exit
> > code anyway, since module unload is never a performance critical path.
> 
> Couldn't you make the same argument about __init functions, which are
> allowed to do static calls?

I suppose we could indeed make that argument. Much of that code was
copied from jump_label without much consideration. And I now I suppose
I'll have to consider jump_label in __exit too :/

> We might consider a STATIC_CALL_SITE_EXIT flag, but I suppose we've run
> out of flag space.

Yeah, we're definitely short on flags. Let me try and figure out when
exactly it's all discarded.