[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFMzoBpuzoA0EswZ@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:04:00 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] mm,page_alloc: Bail out earlier on -ENOMEM in
alloc_contig_migrate_range
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 03:05:40PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> That being said, bailing out early makes sense to me. But now that
> you've made me look into the migrate_pages excellent error state reporting
> I suspect we have a bug here. Note the
> "Returns the number of pages that were not migrated, or an error code."
>
> but I do not see putback_movable_pages for ret > 0 so it seems we might
> leak some pages.
I fell for the same thing when looking at that code.
It took a while until I realized what was really going on.
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> > Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
>
> The patch itself looks reasonable but make sure to mention this is mere
> cosmetic change unless there is a real problem fixed by this.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
What about appending the following in the changelog:
"Note that this is not fixing a real issue, just a cosmetic change. Although
we can save some cycles by backing off ealier."
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists