linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:45:21 +0530
From:   Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        jbaron@...mai.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 17:10, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> After more poking a new set of patches to fix static_call() vs __exit
> functions. These patches replace the patch I posted yesterday:
>
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YFH6BR61b5GK8ITo@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> Since I've reproduced the problem locally, and these patches do seem to fully
> cure things, I'll shortly queue them for tip/locking/urgent.
>

Thanks Peter for these fixes, works fine for me.

FWIW:

Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>

-Sumit