[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <062f3050-342d-9bd5-6b9d-b6488e873094@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 19:35:11 +0530
From: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, shumingf@...ltek.com,
flove@...ltek.com, derek.fang@...ltek.com,
Alexander.Deucher@....com, Basavaraj.Hiregoudar@....com,
Sunil-kumar.Dommati@....com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>,
Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] ASoC: amd: fix multiple definition error
On 18/03/21 6:32 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:03:47AM +0530, Vijendar Mukunda wrote:
>> make W=1 ARCH=x86_64 error:
>> acp3x-rt5682-max9836.c:(.text+0x840): multiple definition of
>> `soc_is_rltk_max';
>> sound/soc/amd/acp-da7219-max98357a.o:acp-da7219-max98357a.c:
>> (.text+0xd00):first defined here
>
> In general you should put fixes at the start of the patch series, or if
> this is a fix for patch 1 that was spotted by the bot when it was posted
> on the list then you should just roll your fix into new versions of
> patch 1.
>
We will roll this fix into new version of patch I
Powered by blists - more mailing lists