| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 15:56:29 +0100
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
To: linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] selftests/kvm: add get_msr_index_features
Test the KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST
and KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST ioctls.
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore | 1 +
tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile | 1 +
.../kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c | 124 ++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 126 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
index 32b87cc77c8e..d99f3969d371 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
/s390x/resets
/s390x/sync_regs_test
/x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+/x86_64/get_msr_index_features
/x86_64/debug_regs
/x86_64/evmcs_test
/x86_64/get_cpuid_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index a6d61f451f88..c748b9650e28 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ LIBKVM_aarch64 = lib/aarch64/processor.c lib/aarch64/ucall.c
LIBKVM_s390x = lib/s390x/processor.c lib/s390x/ucall.c lib/s390x/diag318_test_handler.c
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 = x86_64/cr4_cpuid_sync_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/get_msr_index_features
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/evmcs_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/get_cpuid_test
TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/hyperv_cpuid
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad9972d99dfa
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/get_msr_index_features.c
@@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Test that KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST and
+ * KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST work as intended
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2020, Red Hat, Inc.
+ */
+#include <fcntl.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <sys/ioctl.h>
+
+#include "test_util.h"
+#include "kvm_util.h"
+#include "processor.h"
+#include "../lib/kvm_util_internal.h"
+
+static int kvm_num_index_msrs(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+ struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+ int r;
+
+ list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+ list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+ r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST, list);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == E2BIG,
+ "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_INDEX_LIST probe, r: %i",
+ r);
+
+ r = list->nmsrs;
+ free(list);
+ return r;
+}
+
+static void test_get_msr_index(void)
+{
+ int old_res, res, kvm_fd;
+
+ kvm_fd = open(KVM_DEV_PATH, O_RDONLY);
+ if (kvm_fd < 0)
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+
+ old_res = kvm_num_index_msrs(kvm_fd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(old_res != 0, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 0");
+
+ if (old_res != 1) {
+ res = kvm_num_index_msrs(kvm_fd, 1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(res > 1, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 1");
+ TEST_ASSERT(res == old_res, "Expecting nmsrs to be identical");
+ }
+
+ close(kvm_fd);
+}
+
+static int kvm_num_feature_msrs(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+ struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+ int r;
+
+ list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+ list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+ r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, list);
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == -1 && errno == E2BIG,
+ "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST probe, r: %i",
+ r);
+
+ r = list->nmsrs;
+ free(list);
+ return r;
+}
+
+struct kvm_msr_list *kvm_get_msr_feature_list(int kvm_fd, int nmsrs)
+{
+ struct kvm_msr_list *list;
+ int r;
+
+ list = malloc(sizeof(*list) + nmsrs * sizeof(list->indices[0]));
+ list->nmsrs = nmsrs;
+ r = ioctl(kvm_fd, KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, list);
+
+ TEST_ASSERT(r == 0,
+ "Unexpected result from KVM_GET_MSR_FEATURE_INDEX_LIST, r: %i",
+ r);
+
+ return list;
+}
+
+static void test_get_msr_feature(void)
+{
+ int res, old_res, i, kvm_fd;
+ struct kvm_msr_list *feature_list;
+
+ kvm_fd = open(KVM_DEV_PATH, O_RDONLY);
+ if (kvm_fd < 0)
+ exit(KSFT_SKIP);
+
+ old_res = kvm_num_feature_msrs(kvm_fd, 0);
+ TEST_ASSERT(old_res != 0, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 0");
+
+ if (old_res != 1) {
+ res = kvm_num_feature_msrs(kvm_fd, 1);
+ TEST_ASSERT(res > 1, "Expecting nmsrs to be > 1");
+ TEST_ASSERT(res == old_res, "Expecting nmsrs to be identical");
+ }
+
+ feature_list = kvm_get_msr_feature_list(kvm_fd, old_res);
+ TEST_ASSERT(old_res == feature_list->nmsrs,
+ "Unmatching number of msr indexes");
+
+ for (i = 0; i < feature_list->nmsrs; i++)
+ kvm_get_feature_msr(feature_list->indices[i]);
+
+ free(feature_list);
+ close(kvm_fd);
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+ if (kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_GET_MSR_FEATURES))
+ test_get_msr_feature();
+
+ test_get_msr_index();
+}
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists