linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c32421c-4bd8-ec46-f1d0-25996956f4da@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:00:17 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Cc:     Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@...il.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
        Alex Shi <alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
        Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>,
        Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com>,
        "open list:BLOCK LAYER" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup

On 3/18/21 9:53 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:30 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>>
>> On 3/16/21 9:36 AM, Dan Schatzberg wrote:
>>> No major changes, just rebasing and resubmitting
>>
>> Applied for 5.13, thanks.
>>
> 
> I have requested a couple of changes in the patch series. Can this
> applied series still be changed or new patches are required?

I have nothing sitting on top of it for now, so as far as I'm concerned
we can apply a new series instead. Then we can also fold in that fix
from Colin that he posted this morning...

-- 
Jens Axboe