[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yw1x1rccie35.fsf@mansr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 17:09:02 +0000
From: Måns Rullgård <mans@...sr.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] alpha: use libata instead of the legacy ide driver
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:54:55AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 05:56:57AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > Switch the alpha defconfig from the legacy ide driver to libata.
>>
>> Umm... I don't have an IDE alpha box in a usable shape (fans on
>> CPU module shat themselves), and it would take a while to resurrect
>> it, but I remember the joy it used to cause in some versions.
>>
>> Do you have reports of libata variants of drivers actually tested on
>> those?
>
> No, I haven't. The whole point is that we're not going to keep 40000
> lines of code around despite notice for users that don't exist or
> care. If there is a regression we'll fix it, but we're not going to
> make life miserable just because we can.
The pata_ali driver works fine on my UP1500 machine, unless something
broke recently. I'll build the latest kernel and report back.
--
Måns Rullgård
Powered by blists - more mailing lists