[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFS6kTe1SuAjiMFN@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:52:01 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, seanjc@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
haitao.huang@...el.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
jethro@...tanix.com, b.thiel@...teo.de, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
corbet@....net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/25] KVM SGX virtualization support
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:29:27PM +1300, Kai Huang wrote:
> This series adds KVM SGX virtualization support. The first 14 patches starting
> with x86/sgx or x86/cpu.. are necessary changes to x86 and SGX core/driver to
> support KVM SGX virtualization, while the rest are patches to KVM subsystem.
>
> This series is based against latest tip/x86/sgx, which has Jarkko's NUMA
> allocation support.
>
> You can also get the code from upstream branch of kvm-sgx repo on github:
>
> https://github.com/intel/kvm-sgx.git upstream
>
> It also requires Qemu changes to create VM with SGX support. You can find Qemu
> repo here:
>
> https://github.com/intel/qemu-sgx.git upstream
>
> Please refer to README.md of above qemu-sgx repo for detail on how to create
> guest with SGX support. At meantime, for your quick reference you can use below
> command to create SGX guest:
>
> #qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 4 -m 2G -drive file=<your_vm_image>,if=virtio \
> -cpu host,+sgx_provisionkey \
> -sgx-epc id=epc1,memdev=mem1 \
> -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=64M,prealloc
>
> Please note that the SGX relevant part is:
>
> -cpu host,+sgx_provisionkey \
> -sgx-epc id=epc1,memdev=mem1 \
> -object memory-backend-epc,id=mem1,size=64M,prealloc
>
> And you can change other parameters of your qemu command based on your needs.
>
> =========
> Changelog:
>
> (Changelog here is for global changes. Please see each patch's changelog for
> changes made to specific patch.)
>
> v2->v3:
>
> - No big change in design, structure of patch series, etc.
> - Rebased to lastest tip/x86/sgx, to resolve merge conflict of patch 3
> (x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from sgx_free_epc_page()).
> - Addressed some Nit issues found by Sean in v2.
> - Also addressed some Nit issues reported by checkpatch.pl. Now there's no
> checkpatch issues.
> - Updated patch 3 (x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from sgx_free_epc_page()):
> - Removed Jarkko from author, per request.
> - Changed to replace all call sites of sgx_free_epc_page() with new
> sgx_encl_free_epc_page(), to make this patch doesn't have functional
> changes (except a WARN upon EREMOVE failure requestd by Dave).
> - Rebased to tip/x86/sgx, which has Jarkko's NUMA allocation.
> - Added Jarkko's Acked-by.
> - Updated patch 8 (x86/sgx: Expose SGX architectural definitions to the
> kernel) to add MAINTAINER file update to include new introduced asm/sgx.h.
> - Updated patch 13 (x86/sgx: Add helpers to expose ECREATE and EINIT to KVM)
> to use addr and size directly in access_ok()s (which won't be triggered
> anyway).
>
> v1->v2:
>
> - No big change in design, structural of patch series, etc.
> - Addressed Boris's comments regarding to suppressing both SGX1 and SGX2 in
> /proc/cpuinfo, and improvement in feat_ctl.c when enabling SGX (patch 2
> and 6).
> - Addressed Sean's comments for both x86 part patches and KVM patches (patch 3,
> 5, 9, 12, 19, 21).
> - Addressed Dave's comments in RFC v6 series (patch 13).
>
> RFC->v1:
>
> - Refined patch (x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from sgx_free_epc_page()) to print
> error msg that EPC page is leaked when EREMOVE failed, requested by Dave.
> - Changelog history of all RFC series is removed in both this cover letter
> and each individual patch, since majority of x86 part patches already got
> Acked-by from Dave and Jarkko. And the changelogs are not quite useful from
> my perspective.
>
> =========
> KVM SGX virtualization Overview
>
> - Virtual EPC
>
> SGX enclave memory is special and is reserved specifically for enclave use.
> In bare-metal SGX enclaves, the kernel allocates enclave pages, copies data
> into the pages with privileged instructions, then allows the enclave to start.
> In this scenario, only initialized pages already assigned to an enclave are
> mapped to userspace.
>
> In virtualized environments, the hypervisor still needs to do the physical
> enclave page allocation. The guest kernel is responsible for the data copying
> (among other things). This means that the job of starting an enclave is now
> split between hypervisor and guest.
>
> This series introduces a new misc device: /dev/sgx_vepc. This device allows
> the host to map *uninitialized* enclave memory into userspace, which can then
> be passed into a guest.
>
> While it might be *possible* to start a host-side enclave with /dev/sgx_enclave
> and pass its memory into a guest, it would be wasteful and convoluted.
>
> Implement the *raw* EPC allocation in the x86 core-SGX subsystem via
> /dev/sgx_vepc rather than in KVM. Doing so has two major advantages:
>
> - Does not require changes to KVM's uAPI, e.g. EPC gets handled as
> just another memory backend for guests.
>
> - EPC management is wholly contained in the SGX subsystem, e.g. SGX
> does not have to export any symbols, changes to reclaim flows don't
> need to be routed through KVM, SGX's dirty laundry doesn't have to
> get aired out for the world to see, and so on and so forth.
>
> The virtual EPC pages allocated to guests are currently not reclaimable.
> Reclaiming EPC page used by enclave requires a special reclaim mechanism
> separate from normal page reclaim, and that mechanism is not supported
> for virutal EPC pages. Due to the complications of handling reclaim
> conflicts between guest and host, reclaiming virtual EPC pages is
> significantly more complex than basic support for SGX virtualization.
>
> - Support SGX virtualization without SGX Flexible Launch Control
>
> SGX hardware supports two "launch control" modes to limit which enclaves can
> run. In the "locked" mode, the hardware prevents enclaves from running unless
> they are blessed by a third party. In the unlocked mode, the kernel is in
> full control of which enclaves can run. The bare-metal SGX code refuses to
> launch enclaves unless it is in the unlocked mode.
>
> This sgx_virt_epc driver does not have such a restriction. This allows guests
> which are OK with the locked mode to use SGX, even if the host kernel refuses
> to.
>
> - Support exposing SGX2
>
> Due to the same reason above, SGX2 feature detection is added to core SGX code
> to allow KVM to expose SGX2 to guest, even currently SGX driver doesn't support
> SGX2, because SGX2 can work just fine in guest w/o any interaction to host SGX
> driver.
>
> - Restricit SGX guest access to provisioning key
>
> To grant guest being able to fully use SGX, guest needs to be able to access
> provisioning key. The provisioning key is sensitive, and accessing to it should
> be restricted. In bare-metal driver, allowing enclave to access provisioning key
> is restricted by being able to open /dev/sgx_provision.
>
> Add a new KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE to KVM uAPI to extend above mechanism to KVM
> guests as well. When userspace hypervisor creates a new VM, the new cap is only
> added to VM when userspace hypervisior is able to open /dev/sgx_provision,
> following the same role as in bare-metal driver. KVM then traps ECREATE from
> guest, and only allows ECREATE with provisioning key bit to run when guest
> supports KVM_CAP_SGX_ATTRIBUTE.
>
>
> Kai Huang (4):
> x86/cpufeatures: Make SGX_LC feature bit depend on SGX bit
> x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from sgx_free_epc_page()
> x86/sgx: Initialize virtual EPC driver even when SGX driver is
> disabled
> x86/sgx: Add helper to update SGX_LEPUBKEYHASHn MSRs
>
> Sean Christopherson (21):
> x86/cpufeatures: Add SGX1 and SGX2 sub-features
> x86/sgx: Add SGX_CHILD_PRESENT hardware error code
> x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests
> x86/cpu/intel: Allow SGX virtualization without Launch Control support
> x86/sgx: Expose SGX architectural definitions to the kernel
> x86/sgx: Move ENCLS leaf definitions to sgx.h
> x86/sgx: Add SGX2 ENCLS leaf definitions (EAUG, EMODPR and EMODT)
> x86/sgx: Add encls_faulted() helper
> x86/sgx: Add helpers to expose ECREATE and EINIT to KVM
> x86/sgx: Move provisioning device creation out of SGX driver
> KVM: x86: Export kvm_mmu_gva_to_gpa_{read,write}() for SGX (VMX)
> KVM: x86: Define new #PF SGX error code bit
> KVM: x86: Add support for reverse CPUID lookup of scattered features
> KVM: x86: Add reverse-CPUID lookup support for scattered SGX features
> KVM: VMX: Add basic handling of VM-Exit from SGX enclave
> KVM: VMX: Frame in ENCLS handler for SGX virtualization
> KVM: VMX: Add SGX ENCLS[ECREATE] handler to enforce CPUID restrictions
> KVM: VMX: Add emulation of SGX Launch Control LE hash MSRs
> KVM: VMX: Add ENCLS[EINIT] handler to support SGX Launch Control (LC)
> KVM: VMX: Enable SGX virtualization for SGX1, SGX2 and LC
> KVM: x86: Add capability to grant VM access to privileged SGX
> attribute
>
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 23 +
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 12 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 5 +
> .../cpu/sgx/arch.h => include/asm/sgx.h} | 50 +-
> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpuid-deps.c | 3 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/feat_ctl.c | 71 ++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/scattered.c | 2 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/driver.c | 17 -
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.c | 42 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encl.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/encls.h | 30 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/ioctl.c | 29 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/main.c | 96 +++-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/sgx.h | 13 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c | 369 ++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 89 +++-
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.h | 50 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 28 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 5 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c | 481 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.h | 34 ++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.c | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmcs12.h | 4 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 109 +++-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 +
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 23 +
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/sgx/defines.h | 2 +-
> 34 files changed, 1476 insertions(+), 124 deletions(-)
> rename arch/x86/{kernel/cpu/sgx/arch.h => include/asm/sgx.h} (89%)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.c
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/sgx.h
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
>
I just say add my ack to SGX specific patches where it is missing.
Good enough.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists