linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFTInvfk0vE4VFvW@dschatzberg-fedora-PC0Y6AEN.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 11:51:58 -0400
From:   Dan Schatzberg <schatzberg.dan@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] loop: Fix missing max_active argument in
 alloc_workqueue call

On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 02:12:10PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/18/21 9:16 AM, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> > 
> > The 3rd argument to alloc_workqueue should be the max_active count,
> > however currently it is the lo->lo_number that is intended for the
> > loop%d number. Fix this by adding in the missing max_active count.
> 
> Dan, please fold this (or something similar) in when you're redoing the
> series.
> 
> -- 
> Jens Axboe
> 

Will do.