linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFTJdL1yDId+iae4@unreal>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 17:55:32 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Stephane Grosjean <s.grosjean@...k-system.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with Linus' tree

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:29:39AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/net/can/usb/peak_usb/pcan_usb_fd.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6417f03132a6 ("module: remove never implemented MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE")
> 
> from Linus' tree and commit:
> 
>   59ec7b89ed3e ("can: peak_usb: add forgotten supported devices")
> 
> from the net tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I just removed the new MODULE_SUPPORTED_DEVICE() lines)
> and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next
> is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
> upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may
> also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting
> tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

Thanks Stephen, the code should be deleted and commit 59ec7b89ed3e needs
to be reverted.

> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell