linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: ipa: introduce ipa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFTrc4wGyZ5142Es@lunn.ch>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:20:35 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
        kuba@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, evgreen@...omium.org,
        cpratapa@...eaurora.org, elder@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: ipa: introduce ipa_assert()

> It will be much better for everyone if you don't obfuscate existing
> kernel primitives and don't hide constant vs. dynamic expressions.
> 
> So any random kernel developer will be able to change the code without
> investing too much time to understand this custom logic.
> 
> And constant expressions are checked with BUILD_BUG_ON().
> 
> If you still feel need to provide assertion like this, it should be done
> in general code.

+1

	Andrew