linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/19] drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs: Move some large variables from the stack to the heap

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 14:31:21 -0400
From:   Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To:     Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        amd-gfx list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Maling list - DRI developers 
        <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Harry Wentland <hwentlan@....com>,
        "Kazlauskas, Nicholas" <nicholas.kazlauskas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs: Move some large
 variables from the stack to the heap

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 2:26 PM Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com> wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-19 2:13 p.m., Alex Deucher wrote:
> > + Harry, Nick
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 4:24 AM Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):
> >>
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c: In function ‘calculate_bandwidth’:
> >>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c:2016:1: warning: the frame size of 1216 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >>
> >> Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>
> >> Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@....com>
> >> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>
> >> Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@....com>
> >> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
> >> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
> >> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> >> Cc: amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org
> >> Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> >> ---
> >>   .../gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c  | 32 ++++++++++++++++---
> >>   1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> index e633f8a51edb6..9d8f2505a61c2 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
> >> @@ -98,16 +98,16 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >>          int32_t num_cursor_lines;
> >>
> >>          int32_t i, j, k;
> >> -       struct bw_fixed yclk[3];
> >> -       struct bw_fixed sclk[8];
> >> +       struct bw_fixed *yclk;
> >> +       struct bw_fixed *sclk;
> >>          bool d0_underlay_enable;
> >>          bool d1_underlay_enable;
> >>          bool fbc_enabled;
> >>          bool lpt_enabled;
> >>          enum bw_defines sclk_message;
> >>          enum bw_defines yclk_message;
> >> -       enum bw_defines tiling_mode[maximum_number_of_surfaces];
> >> -       enum bw_defines surface_type[maximum_number_of_surfaces];
> >> +       enum bw_defines *tiling_mode;
> >> +       enum bw_defines *surface_type;
> >>          enum bw_defines voltage;
> >>          enum bw_defines pipe_check;
> >>          enum bw_defines hsr_check;
> >> @@ -122,6 +122,22 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >>          int32_t number_of_displays_enabled_with_margin = 0;
> >>          int32_t number_of_aligned_displays_with_no_margin = 0;
> >>
> >> +       yclk = kcalloc(3, sizeof(*yclk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +       if (!yclk)
> >> +               return;
> >> +
> >> +       sclk = kcalloc(8, sizeof(*sclk), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +       if (!sclk)
> >> +               goto free_yclk;
> >> +
> >> +       tiling_mode = kcalloc(maximum_number_of_surfaces, sizeof(*tiling_mode), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +       if (!tiling_mode)
> >> +               goto free_sclk;
> >> +
> >> +       surface_type = kcalloc(maximum_number_of_surfaces, sizeof(*surface_type), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +       if (!surface_type)
> >> +               goto free_tiling_mode;
> >> +
> >
> >
> > Harry or Nick can correct me if I'm wrong, but for this patch and the
> > next one, I think this can be called from an atomic context.
> >
>
>  From what I can see this doesn't seem the case. If I'm missing
> something someone please correct me.
>
> This and the next (06/19) patch are both
> Reviewed-by: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@....com>

Thanks.  I've applied them.

Alex

>
> Harry
>
> > Alex
> >
> >>          yclk[low] = vbios->low_yclk;
> >>          yclk[mid] = vbios->mid_yclk;
> >>          yclk[high] = vbios->high_yclk;
> >> @@ -2013,6 +2029,14 @@ static void calculate_bandwidth(
> >>                          }
> >>                  }
> >>          }
> >> +
> >> +       kfree(surface_type);
> >> +free_tiling_mode:
> >> +       kfree(tiling_mode);
> >> +free_yclk:
> >> +       kfree(yclk);
> >> +free_sclk:
> >> +       kfree(sclk);
> >>   }
> >>
> >>   /*******************************************************************************
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dri-devel mailing list
> >> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel>

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives