linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: scan: Use unique number for instance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:33:12 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ACPI: scan: Use unique number for instance_no

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:06:18PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:02 PM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> > This is a slightly convoluted way of stating that there is a bug in
> > acpi_device_del().
> 
> Any suggestion how to massage the above?
> But in the dry end, yes, decrementing is a bug.

Okay, v2 has been sent. I tried to simplify the message.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko