[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <007c0317-8819-a6b8-fdff-c0b5899c4f51@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 21:48:11 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, joaodias@...gle.com,
willy@...radead.org, david@...hat.com, surenb@...gle.com,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] mm: cma: support sysfs
19.03.2021 21:21, Minchan Kim пишет:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 08:56:06PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 19.03.2021 19:30, Minchan Kim пишет:
>>> +static void cma_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
>>> +{
>>> + struct cma_kobject *cma_kobj = container_of(kobj, struct cma_kobject, kobj);
>>> +
>>> + kfree(cma_kobj);
>>> +}
>>
>> Oh, wait.. I think this kfree wrong since cma_kobj belongs to the array.
>
> Oh, good spot. Let me use kzalloc.
>
Thinking a bit more about this.. it looks like actually it should be
better to get back to the older variant of cma_stat, but allocate at the
time of CMA initialization, rather than at the time of sysfs
initialization. Then the cma_stat will be decoupled from the cma struct
and cma_stat will be a self-contained object.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists