linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ACPI: video: Add missing callback back for Sony VPCEH3U1E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0ihOVEFvcLLPmXGQ7aj91+BLpJQm12HE=pLpHKbDv-9jA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:53:40 +0100
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, chris.chiu@...onical.com,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: video: Add missing callback back for Sony VPCEH3U1E

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:48 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
>
> On Fri 2021-03-19 17:44:32, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 11:27 AM Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri 2021-03-12 11:24:30, chris.chiu@...onical.com wrote:
> > > > From: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>
> > > >
> > > > The .callback of the quirk for Sony VPCEH3U1E was unintetionally
> > > > removed by the commit 25417185e9b5 ("ACPI: video: Add DMI quirk
> > > > for GIGABYTE GB-BXBT-2807"). Add it back to make sure the quirk
> > > > for Sony VPCEH3U1E works as expected.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Chiu <chris.chiu@...onical.com>
> > > > Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> > >
> > > Thanks for doing this.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@...x.de>
> >
> > Applied as 5.12-rc5 material, thanks!
>
> Commit 25417185e9b5 made it into stable, so this one should be Cc:
> stable as well. Sorry for noticing that late.

Well, do you know which -stable series it went into?

I've added a "Cc: stable" tag to this one, but it most likely doesn't
cover all of them.