[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202103191230.5054A14247@keescook>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:31:57 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: 0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lkp@...ts.01.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
zhengjun.xing@...el.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
Adam Nichols <adam@...mm-co.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [seq_file] 5fd6060e50: stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec -49.1%
regression
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:07:42PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -49.1% regression of stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec due to commit:
Well, so it can be seen. ;) Though I feel slightly better that it's stress-ng
instead of a "normal" workload.
Thanks for the report!
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists