linux-kernel - Re: [seq_file] 5fd6060e50: stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:31:57 -0700
From:   Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:     kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc:     0day robot <lkp@...el.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkp@...ts.01.org, ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com,
        zhengjun.xing@...el.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>, Chris Leech <cleech@...hat.com>,
        Adam Nichols <adam@...mm-co.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [seq_file]  5fd6060e50:  stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec -49.1%
 regression

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:07:42PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> FYI, we noticed a -49.1% regression of stress-ng.eventfd.ops_per_sec due to commit:

Well, so it can be seen. ;) Though I feel slightly better that it's stress-ng
instead of a "normal" workload.

Thanks for the report!

-- 
Kees Cook