linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFT8wDrWvfpQoIWw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 20:34:24 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        jbaron@...mai.com, ardb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sumit.garg@...aro.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, jarkko@...nel.org,
        jeyu@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:00:05PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Would making __exit code the same as init code work? That is, load it just
> like module init code is loaded, and free it when the init code is freed

As stated, yes. But it must then also identify as init through
within_module_init().