linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v23 00/28] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <adb72123-e8b3-c022-47da-b8c423952caf@intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 14:43:04 -0700
From:   "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
        Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
        Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
        Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
        Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
        Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
        Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v23 00/28] Control-flow Enforcement: Shadow Stack

On 3/16/2021 2:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 08:10:26AM -0700, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is a new Intel processor feature that blocks
>> return/jump-oriented programming attacks.  Details are in "Intel 64 and
>> IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual" [1].
>>
>> CET can protect applications and the kernel.  This series enables only
>> application-level protection, and has three parts:
>>
>>    - Shadow stack [2],
>>    - Indirect branch tracking [3], and
>>    - Selftests [4].
> 
> CET is marketing; afaict SS and IBT are 100% independent and there's no
> reason what so ever to have them share any code, let alone a Kconfig
> knob.
> > In fact, I think all of this would improve is you remove the CET name
> from all of this entirely. Put this series under CONFIG_X86_SHSTK (or
> _SS) and use CONFIG_X86_IBT for the other one.
> 
> Similarly with the .c file.
> 
> All this CET business is just pure confusion.
> 

What about this, we bring back CONFIG_X86_SHSTK and CONFIG_X86_IBT.
For the CET name itself, can we change it to CFE (Control Flow 
Enforcement), or just CF?

In signal handling, ELF header parsing and arch_prctl(), shadow stack 
and IBT pretty much share the same code.  It is better not to split them 
into two sets of files.

Thanks,
Yu-cheng