[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210319221432.26631-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 03:44:33 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: unixbhaskar@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gustavoars@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes
s/purpuse/purpose/
s/seperately/separately/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error,
{
get_task_struct(q->sleeper);
- /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */
+ /* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */
smp_store_release(&q->status, error);
wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper);
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
* - complex operations always restart.
- * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+ * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
* - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
* altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
* simple increments never sleep.
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists