[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210319221432.26631-1-unixbhaskar@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2021 03:44:33 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     unixbhaskar@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        gustavoars@...nel.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ipc/sem.c: Couple of spelling fixes
s/purpuse/purpose/
s/seperately/separately/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
---
 ipc/sem.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem.c b/ipc/sem.c
index f6c30a85dadf..780d75eff8c6 100644
--- a/ipc/sem.c
+++ b/ipc/sem.c
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ static inline void wake_up_sem_queue_prepare(struct sem_queue *q, int error,
 {
 	get_task_struct(q->sleeper);
-	/* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpuse/pairing */
+	/* see SEM_BARRIER_2 for purpose/pairing */
 	smp_store_release(&q->status, error);
 	wake_q_add_safe(wake_q, q->sleeper);
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static inline int check_restart(struct sem_array *sma, struct sem_queue *q)
 	/* It is impossible that someone waits for the new value:
 	 * - complex operations always restart.
-	 * - wait-for-zero are handled seperately.
+	 * - wait-for-zero are handled separately.
 	 * - q is a previously sleeping simple operation that
 	 *   altered the array. It must be a decrement, because
 	 *   simple increments never sleep.
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists