linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3] blk-mq: Trivial typo fix and sentence construction for better readability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFUryzVjSQU0RqCv@Gentoo>
Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2021 04:25:07 +0530
From:   Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] blk-mq: Trivial typo fix and sentence construction
 for better readability

On 16:19 Fri 19 Mar 2021, Jens Axboe wrote:
>On 3/19/21 2:39 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> On 14:27 Fri 19 Mar 2021, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 3/19/21 2:23 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>>>>
>>>> A typo fix and sentence reconstruction for better readability.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   Changes from V2:
>>>>   Thanks, Randy and Tom for the suggestion,mould it.
>>>>   Missed the subject line prefix of pattern,so added back
>>>>
>>>>  block/blk-mq-tag.c | 4 ++--
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq-tag.c b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>>>> index 9c92053e704d..9da426d20f12 100644
>>>> --- a/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>>>> +++ b/block/blk-mq-tag.c
>>>> @@ -373,8 +373,8 @@ static bool blk_mq_tagset_count_completed_rqs(struct request *rq,
>>>>  }
>>>>
>>>>  /**
>>>> - * blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request - wait until all completed req's
>>>> - * complete funtion is run
>>>> + * blk_mq_tagset_wait_completed_request - wait until all the req's
>>>> + * functions completed their run
>>>
>>> This is still nonsense, see reply to previous version.
>>>
>> Well, I was just trying get a sense of your sense...so ...it's all yours
>> fella,take on ...
>
>It's not my sense, I didn't write that function or comment. Just seems
>pointless to me to update it and not get it actually legible and
>correct, which is why I sent you a suggestion to what should be. From
>that point of view, the suggested change actually makes it _worse_,
>because "requests functions completed their run" doesn't mean anything.
>At least the current one is kind of legible, since the "complete
>function" refers to the IPI completion function, which is what we're
>waiting for here.
>
>In any case, what I replied in v2 should be generally readable, and
>avoids the weird req's thing too which I really dislike. Just uses
>requests, that's correct and avoids a nonsensical possessive.
>
>So do send a v4 if you want with that wording.
>
I am apologetic about the pain I caused you to take this long route. I shall be
  prudent in the future. Thanks for standing, Jens.
>--
>Jens Axboe
>

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)