lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 07:21:27 +0000
From:   Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
To:     Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
CC:     "kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        "festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
        "sumit.semwal@...aro.org" <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
        "christian.koenig@....com" <christian.koenig@....com>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: fix i2c timing issue


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 13:15
> To: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de
> Cc: kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com; dl-linux-imx <linux-
> imx@....com>; sumit.semwal@...aro.org; christian.koenig@....com;
> linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 09/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: fix i2c timing issue
>
> > From: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:54 PM
> >
> > The clkhi and clklo ratio was not very precise before that can make
> > the time of START/STOP/HIGH LEVEL out of specification.
> >
> > Therefore, the calculation of these times has been modified in this patch.
> > At the same time, the mode rate definition of i2c is corrected.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> > index 7216a393095d..5dbe85126f24 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> > @@ -73,17 +73,17 @@
> >  #define MCFGR1_IGNACK	BIT(9)
> >  #define MRDR_RXEMPTY	BIT(14)
> >
> > -#define I2C_CLK_RATIO	2
> > +#define I2C_CLK_RATIO	24 / 59
>
> Where is this ratio coming from?
> Can you describe why use it in commit message?

This ratio is a value obtained after passing the test.
I2C's Tlow should longer than the spec.
For example, in FAST mode, Tlow should be longer than 1.3us.
The previous calculation violated the spec.
So I re-write the calculation of clk_cycle by referring the RM. Then test the 
ratio to let Tlow match the spec by catching the waveform.

Best Regards,
Clark Wang

>
> Regards
> Aisheng
>
> >  #define CHUNK_DATA	256
> >
> >  #define I2C_PM_TIMEOUT		1000 /* ms */
> >
> >  enum lpi2c_imx_mode {
> > -	STANDARD,	/* 100+Kbps */
> > -	FAST,		/* 400+Kbps */
> > -	FAST_PLUS,	/* 1.0+Mbps */
> > -	HS,		/* 3.4+Mbps */
> > -	ULTRA_FAST,	/* 5.0+Mbps */
> > +	STANDARD,	/* <=100Kbps */
> > +	FAST,		/* <=400Kbps */
> > +	FAST_PLUS,	/* <=1.0Mbps */
> > +	HS,		/* <=3.4Mbps */
> > +	ULTRA_FAST,	/* <=5.0Mbps */
> >  };
> >
> >  enum lpi2c_imx_pincfg {
> > @@ -156,13 +156,13 @@ static void lpi2c_imx_set_mode(struct
> > lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> >  	unsigned int bitrate = lpi2c_imx->bitrate;
> >  	enum lpi2c_imx_mode mode;
> >
> > -	if (bitrate < I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ)
> > +	if (bitrate <= I2C_MAX_STANDARD_MODE_FREQ)
> >  		mode = STANDARD;
> > -	else if (bitrate < I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ)
> > +	else if (bitrate <= I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_FREQ)
> >  		mode = FAST;
> > -	else if (bitrate < I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
> > +	else if (bitrate <= I2C_MAX_FAST_MODE_PLUS_FREQ)
> >  		mode = FAST_PLUS;
> > -	else if (bitrate < I2C_MAX_ULTRA_FAST_MODE_FREQ)
> > +	else if (bitrate <= I2C_MAX_HIGH_SPEED_MODE_FREQ)
> >  		mode = HS;
> >  	else
> >  		mode = ULTRA_FAST;
> > @@ -209,7 +209,8 @@ static void lpi2c_imx_stop(struct lpi2c_imx_struct
> > *lpi2c_imx)
> >  	} while (1);
> >  }
> >
> > -/* CLKLO = I2C_CLK_RATIO * CLKHI, SETHOLD = CLKHI, DATAVD = CLKHI/2
> > */
> > +/* CLKLO = (1 - I2C_CLK_RATIO) * clk_cycle, SETHOLD = CLKHI, DATAVD =
> > CLKHI/2
> > +   CLKHI = I2C_CLK_RATIO * clk_cycle */
> >  static int lpi2c_imx_config(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)  {
> >  	u8 prescale, filt, sethold, clkhi, clklo, datavd; @@ -232,8 +233,8
> > @@ static int lpi2c_imx_config(struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx)
> >
> >  	for (prescale = 0; prescale <= 7; prescale++) {
> >  		clk_cycle = clk_rate / ((1 << prescale) * lpi2c_imx->bitrate)
> > -			    - 3 - (filt >> 1);
> > -		clkhi = (clk_cycle + I2C_CLK_RATIO) / (I2C_CLK_RATIO + 1);
> > +			    - (2 + filt) / (1 << prescale);
> > +		clkhi = clk_cycle * I2C_CLK_RATIO;
> >  		clklo = clk_cycle - clkhi;
> >  		if (clklo < 64)
> >  			break;
> > --
> > 2.25.1


Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (9583 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ