| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <bac6b366-c324-dea8-1cc2-5977fb6e0af5@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:38:26 +0100
From: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf annotate: improve --stdio mode
PING
On 2/26/21 10:24 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 2/23/21 8:47 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> Em Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 01:46:36PM +0100, Martin Liška escreveu:
>>> The patch changes the output format in 2 ways:
>>> - line number is displayed for all source lines (matching TUI mode)
>>
>> Are you aware of 'perf annotate --stdio2' ? If the goal is to make the
>> stdio mode better, doing it in that mode would be best, as it was done
>> to share as much code as possible, not just the looks, with the TUI
>> mode.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of it. My motivation is to generate a HTML perf annotate report
> and I see the following parts of --stdio2 not ideal:
>
> - coloring is not available (--stdio-color=always does not work)
> - 'Sorted summary for file ' is missing so one can't easily search for
> hot spots in browser
> - source line number are displayed, but not the source files
> - there's a missing option for 'Toggle disassembler output/simplified view' which
> is available in TUI mode
>
> That said, the stdio2 annotation report is quite different and so handy for my use case.
>
>>
>> I kept --stdio around because changing the output in that way could
>> annoy people used to that format.
>
> Sure. But I think the current format provides quite broken visual layout:
>
> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> eff.c:1811 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8>
> : TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>
> vs.
>
> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
> 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> // eff.c:1811
> : 1810 TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>
> I bet also the current users of --stdio mode would benefit from it.
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
>>
>> Please take a look at 'man perf-config' and see what can be configured
>> for both 'perf annotate --tui' and 'perf annotate --stdio2'.
>>
>> Perhaps we can do something like:
>>
>> perf config annotate.stdio=tui_like
>>
>> And, for completeness have:
>>
>> perf config annotate.stdio=classical
>>
>> wdyt?
>>
>> Looking at the other patches now.
>>
>> - Arnaldo
>>
>>> - source locations for the hottest lines are printed
>>> at the line end in order to preserve layout
>>>
>>> Before:
>>>
>>> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
>>> : tmpsd * (TD + tmpsd * TDD)));
>>> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
>>> : tmpsd * (TC +
>>> eff.c:1811 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8>
>>> : TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>>> 0.35 : 405f06: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b1(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c0>
>>> : dumbo =
>>> eff.c:1809 1.41 : 405f0f: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b0(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c8>
>>> : sumi -= sj * tmpsd * dij2i * dumbo;
>>> eff.c:1813 2.58 : 405f18: vmulsd %xmm3,%xmm0,%xmm0
>>> 2.81 : 405f1c: vfnmadd213sd 0x30(%rsp),%xmm1,%xmm0
>>> 3.78 : 405f23: vmovsd %xmm0,0x30(%rsp)
>>> : for (k = 0; k < lpears[i] + upears[i]; k++) {
>>> eff.c:1761 0.90 : 405f29: cmp %r15d,%r12d
>>>
>>> After:
>>>
>>> 0.00 : 405ef1: inc %r15
>>> : 1812 tmpsd * (TD + tmpsd * TDD)));
>>> 0.01 : 405ef4: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b3(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b0>
>>> : 1811 tmpsd * (TC +
>>> 0.67 : 405efd: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b2(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318b8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8b8> // eff.c:1811
>>> : 1810 TA + tmpsd * (TB +
>>> 0.35 : 405f06: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b1(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c0 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c0>
>>> : 1809 dumbo =
>>> 1.41 : 405f0f: vfmadd213sd 0x2b9b0(%rip),%xmm0,%xmm3 # 4318c8 <_IO_stdin_used+0x8c8> // eff.c:1809
>>> : 1813 sumi -= sj * tmpsd * dij2i * dumbo;
>>> 2.58 : 405f18: vmulsd %xmm3,%xmm0,%xmm0 // eff.c:1813
>>> 2.81 : 405f1c: vfnmadd213sd 0x30(%rsp),%xmm1,%xmm0
>>> 3.78 : 405f23: vmovsd %xmm0,0x30(%rsp)
>>> : 1761 for (k = 0; k < lpears[i] + upears[i]; k++) {
>>>
>>> Where e.g. '// eff.c:1811' shares the same color as the percentantage
>>> at the line beginning.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>
>>> ---
>>> tools/perf/util/annotate.c | 30 ++++++++++++++----------------
>>> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> index e60841b86d27..80542012ec1b 100644
>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
>>> @@ -1366,7 +1366,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
>>> {
>>> struct disasm_line *dl = container_of(al, struct disasm_line, al);
>>> static const char *prev_line;
>>> - static const char *prev_color;
>>> if (al->offset != -1) {
>>> double max_percent = 0.0;
>>> @@ -1405,20 +1404,6 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
>>> color = get_percent_color(max_percent);
>>> - /*
>>> - * Also color the filename and line if needed, with
>>> - * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it
>>> - * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line
>>> - */
>>> - if (al->path) {
>>> - if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path)
>>> - || color != prev_color) {
>>> - color_fprintf(stdout, color, " %s", al->path);
>>> - prev_line = al->path;
>>> - prev_color = color;
>>> - }
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> for (i = 0; i < nr_percent; i++) {
>>> struct annotation_data *data = &al->data[i];
>>> double percent;
>>> @@ -1439,6 +1424,19 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
>>> printf(" : ");
>>> disasm_line__print(dl, start, addr_fmt_width);
>>> +
>>> + /*
>>> + * Also color the filename and line if needed, with
>>> + * the same color than the percentage. Don't print it
>>> + * twice for close colored addr with the same filename:line
>>> + */
>>> + if (al->path) {
>>> + if (!prev_line || strcmp(prev_line, al->path)) {
>>> + color_fprintf(stdout, color, " // %s", al->path);
>>> + prev_line = al->path;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> printf("\n");
>>> } else if (max_lines && printed >= max_lines)
>>> return 1;
>>> @@ -1454,7 +1452,7 @@ annotation_line__print(struct annotation_line *al, struct symbol *sym, u64 start
>>> if (!*al->line)
>>> printf(" %*s:\n", width, " ");
>>> else
>>> - printf(" %*s: %*s %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, " ", al->line);
>>> + printf(" %*s: %-*d %s\n", width, " ", addr_fmt_width, al->line_nr, al->line);
>>> }
>>> return 0;
>>> --
>>> 2.30.1
>>>
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists