linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFR0GJef8Y81gPYr@kroah.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:51:20 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/290] 5.10.24-rc1 review

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 01:36:06PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 3/15/2021 6:51 AM, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> > 
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.24 release.
> > There are 290 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Wed, 17 Mar 2021 13:55:02 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.24-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > 
> > thanks,
> > 
> > greg k-h
> 
> On ARCH_BRCMSTB, using 32-bit and 64-bit kernels:
> 
> Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>

Thanks for testing!