linux-kernel - Re: [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 1/2] vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for protection against instrumentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 12:55:50 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
Cc:     Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [for-stable-4.19 PATCH 1/2] vmlinux.lds.h: Create section for
 protection against instrumentation

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 12:20:22PM +0100, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
> 
> On 3/19/21 11:39 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 07:54:15AM +0800, Nicolas Boichat wrote:
> > > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > 
> > > commit 6553896666433e7efec589838b400a2a652b3ffa upstream.
> > > 
> > > Some code pathes, especially the low level entry code, must be protected
> > > against instrumentation for various reasons:
> > > 
> > >   - Low level entry code can be a fragile beast, especially on x86.
> > > 
> > >   - With NO_HZ_FULL RCU state needs to be established before using it.
> > > 
> > > Having a dedicated section for such code allows to validate with tooling
> > > that no unsafe functions are invoked.
> > > 
> > > Add the .noinstr.text section and the noinstr attribute to mark
> > > functions. noinstr implies notrace. Kprobes will gain a section check
> > > later.
> > > 
> > > Provide also a set of markers: instrumentation_begin()/end()
> > > 
> > > These are used to mark code inside a noinstr function which calls
> > > into regular instrumentable text section as safe.
> > > 
> > > The instrumentation markers are only active when CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY is
> > > enabled as the end marker emits a NOP to prevent the compiler from merging
> > > the annotation points. This means the objtool verification requires a
> > > kernel compiled with this option.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > Reviewed-by: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>
> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200505134100.075416272@linutronix.de
> > > 
> > > [Nicolas: context conflicts in:
> > > 	arch/powerpc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> > > 	include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
> > > 	include/linux/compiler.h
> > > 	include/linux/compiler_types.h]
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>
> > 
> > Did you build this on x86?
> > 
> > I get the following build error:
> > 
> > ld:./arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds:20: syntax error
> > 
> > And that line looks like:
> > 
> >   . = ALIGN(8); *(.text.hot .text.hot.*) *(.text .text.fixup) *(.text.unlikely .text.unlikely.*) *(.text.unknown .text.unknown.*) . = ALIGN(8); __noinstr_text_start = .; *(.__attribute__((noinline)) __attribute__((no_instrument_function)) __attribute((__section__(".noinstr.text"))).text) __noinstr_text_end = .; *(.text..refcount) *(.ref.text) *(.meminit.text*) *(.memexit.text*)
> > 
> 
> In the NOINSTR_TEXT macro, noinstr is expanded with the value of the noinstr
> macro from linux/compiler_types.h while it shouldn't.
> 
> The problem is possibly that the noinstr macro is defined for assembly. Make
> sure that the macro is not defined for assembly e.g.:
> 
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> 
> /* Section for code which can't be instrumented at all */
> #define noinstr								\
> 	noinline notrace __attribute((__section__(".noinstr.text")))
> 
> #endif

This implies that the backport is incorrect, so I'll wait for an updated
version...

thanks,

greg k-h