linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 5/8] bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210319121744.281771105@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:18:24 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 5/8] bpf: Simplify alu_limit masking for pointer arithmetic

From: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>

commit b5871dca250cd391885218b99cc015aca1a51aea upstream.

Instead of having the mov32 with aux->alu_limit - 1 immediate, move this
operation to retrieve_ptr_limit() instead to simplify the logic and to
allow for subsequent sanity boundary checks inside retrieve_ptr_limit().
This avoids in future that at the time of the verifier masking rewrite
we'd run into an underflow which would not sign extend due to the nature
of mov32 instruction.

Signed-off-by: Piotr Krysiuk <piotras@...il.com>
Co-developed-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -2740,16 +2740,16 @@ static int retrieve_ptr_limit(const stru
 	case PTR_TO_STACK:
 		off = ptr_reg->off + ptr_reg->var_off.value;
 		if (mask_to_left)
-			*ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off + 1;
+			*ptr_limit = MAX_BPF_STACK + off;
 		else
-			*ptr_limit = -off;
+			*ptr_limit = -off - 1;
 		return 0;
 	case PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
 		if (mask_to_left) {
-			*ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off + 1;
+			*ptr_limit = ptr_reg->umax_value + ptr_reg->off;
 		} else {
 			off = ptr_reg->smin_value + ptr_reg->off;
-			*ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off;
+			*ptr_limit = ptr_reg->map_ptr->value_size - off - 1;
 		}
 		return 0;
 	default:
@@ -6089,7 +6089,7 @@ static int fixup_bpf_calls(struct bpf_ve
 			off_reg = issrc ? insn->src_reg : insn->dst_reg;
 			if (isneg)
 				*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_MUL, off_reg, -1);
-			*patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit - 1);
+			*patch++ = BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_AX, aux->alu_limit);
 			*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
 			*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, BPF_REG_AX, off_reg);
 			*patch++ = BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_NEG, BPF_REG_AX, 0);