linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpU45vQMB_gdGnodV1=-fORJgtG3VXpeLaKvw4p5vMZhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 14:29:39 +0100
From:   Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "elaine.zhang" <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "PM: runtime: Update device status before
 letting suppliers suspend"

On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 19:15, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
>
> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
>
> Revert commit 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status
> before letting suppliers suspend") that introduced a race condition
> into __rpm_callback() which allowed a concurrent rpm_resume() to
> run and resume the device prematurely after its status had been
> changed to RPM_SUSPENDED by __rpm_callback().

Huh, the code path is not entirely easy to follow. :-)

Did you find this by code inspection or did you get an error report?

>
> Fixes: 44cc89f76464 ("PM: runtime: Update device status before letting suppliers suspend")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/24dfb6fc-5d54-6ee2-9195-26428b7ecf8a@intel.com/
> Reported by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
> Cc: 4.10+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 4.10+
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>

Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe


> ---
>  drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 62 +++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> index 18b82427d0cb..a46a7e30881b 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
> @@ -325,22 +325,22 @@ static void rpm_put_suppliers(struct device *dev)
>  static int __rpm_callback(int (*cb)(struct device *), struct device *dev)
>         __releases(&dev->power.lock) __acquires(&dev->power.lock)
>  {
> -       bool use_links = dev->power.links_count > 0;
> -       bool get = false;
>         int retval, idx;
> -       bool put;
> +       bool use_links = dev->power.links_count > 0;
>
>         if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
>                 spin_unlock(&dev->power.lock);
> -       } else if (!use_links) {
> -               spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
>         } else {
> -               get = dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_RESUMING;
> -
>                 spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
>
> -               /* Resume suppliers if necessary. */
> -               if (get) {
> +               /*
> +                * Resume suppliers if necessary.
> +                *
> +                * The device's runtime PM status cannot change until this
> +                * routine returns, so it is safe to read the status outside of
> +                * the lock.
> +                */
> +               if (use_links && dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_RESUMING) {
>                         idx = device_links_read_lock();
>
>                         retval = rpm_get_suppliers(dev);
> @@ -355,36 +355,24 @@ static int __rpm_callback(int (*cb)(struct device *), struct device *dev)
>
>         if (dev->power.irq_safe) {
>                 spin_lock(&dev->power.lock);
> -               return retval;
> -       }
> -
> -       spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> -
> -       if (!use_links)
> -               return retval;
> -
> -       /*
> -        * If the device is suspending and the callback has returned success,
> -        * drop the usage counters of the suppliers that have been reference
> -        * counted on its resume.
> -        *
> -        * Do that if the resume fails too.
> -        */
> -       put = dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING && !retval;
> -       if (put)
> -               __update_runtime_status(dev, RPM_SUSPENDED);
> -       else
> -               put = get && retval;
> -
> -       if (put) {
> -               spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
> -
> -               idx = device_links_read_lock();
> +       } else {
> +               /*
> +                * If the device is suspending and the callback has returned
> +                * success, drop the usage counters of the suppliers that have
> +                * been reference counted on its resume.
> +                *
> +                * Do that if resume fails too.
> +                */
> +               if (use_links
> +                   && ((dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_SUSPENDING && !retval)
> +                   || (dev->power.runtime_status == RPM_RESUMING && retval))) {
> +                       idx = device_links_read_lock();
>
> -fail:
> -               rpm_put_suppliers(dev);
> + fail:
> +                       rpm_put_suppliers(dev);
>
> -               device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> +                       device_links_read_unlock(idx);
> +               }
>
>                 spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
>         }
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
>
>