linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] btrfs: Allow read-only mount with corrupted extent tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f48c758a-39a3-c73e-fc50-5ab37d2280f9@gmx.com>
Date:   Sat, 20 Mar 2021 08:34:14 +0800
From:   Qu Wenruo <quwenruo.btrfs@....com>
To:     Dāvis Mosāns <davispuh@...il.com>
Cc:     Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, clm@...com,
        Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>, dsterba@...e.com,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@...il.furryterror.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] btrfs: Allow read-only mount with corrupted extent tree



On 2021/3/19 下午11:34, Dāvis Mosāns wrote:
> ceturtd., 2021. g. 18. marts, plkst. 01:49 — lietotājs Qu Wenruo
> (<quwenruo.btrfs@....com>) rakstīja:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2021/3/18 上午5:03, Dāvis Mosāns wrote:
>>> trešd., 2021. g. 17. marts, plkst. 12:28 — lietotājs Qu Wenruo
>>> (<quwenruo.btrfs@....com>) rakstīja:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2021/3/17 上午9:29, Dāvis Mosāns wrote:
>>>>> trešd., 2021. g. 17. marts, plkst. 03:18 — lietotājs Dāvis Mosāns
>>>>> (<davispuh@...il.com>) rakstīja:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Currently if there's any corruption at all in extent tree
>>>>>> (eg. even single bit) then mounting will fail with:
>>>>>> "failed to read block groups: -5" (-EIO)
>>>>>> It happens because we immediately abort on first error when
>>>>>> searching in extent tree for block groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now with this patch if `ignorebadroots` option is specified
>>>>>> then we handle such case and continue by removing already
>>>>>> created block groups and creating dummy block groups.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dāvis Mosāns <davispuh@...il.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>>>>     fs/btrfs/disk-io.c     |  4 ++--
>>>>>>     fs/btrfs/disk-io.h     |  2 ++
>>>>>>     3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
>>>>>> index 48ebc106a606..827a977614b3 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
>>>>>> @@ -2048,6 +2048,20 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_fs_info *info)
>>>>>>            ret = check_chunk_block_group_mappings(info);
>>>>>>     error:
>>>>>>            btrfs_free_path(path);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +       if (ret == -EIO && btrfs_test_opt(info, IGNOREBADROOTS)) {
>>>>>> +               btrfs_put_block_group_cache(info);
>>>>>> +               btrfs_stop_all_workers(info);
>>>>>> +               btrfs_free_block_groups(info);
>>>>>> +               ret = btrfs_init_workqueues(info, NULL);
>>>>>> +               if (ret)
>>>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>>>> +               ret = btrfs_init_space_info(info);
>>>>>> +               if (ret)
>>>>>> +                       return ret;
>>>>>> +               return fill_dummy_bgs(info);
>>>>
>>>> When we hit bad things in extent tree, we should ensure we're mounting
>>>> the fs RO, or we can't continue.
>>>>
>>>> And we should also refuse to mount back to RW if we hit such case, so
>>>> that we don't need anything complex, just ignore the whole extent tree
>>>> and create the dummy block groups.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That's what we're doing here, `ignorebadroots` implies RO mount and
>>> without specifying it doesn't mount at all.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This isn't that nice, but I don't really know how to properly clean up
>>>>> everything related to already created block groups so this was easiest
>>>>> way. It seems to work fine.
>>>>> But looks like need to do something about replay log aswell because if
>>>>> it's not disabled then it fails with:
>>>>>
>>>>> [ 1397.246869] BTRFS info (device sde): start tree-log replay
>>>>> [ 1398.218685] BTRFS warning (device sde): sde checksum verify failed
>>>>> on 21057127661568 wanted 0xd1506ed9 found 0x22ab750a level 0
>>>>> [ 1398.218803] BTRFS warning (device sde): sde checksum verify failed
>>>>> on 21057127661568 wanted 0xd1506ed9 found 0x7dd54bb9 level 0
>>>>> [ 1398.218813] BTRFS: error (device sde) in __btrfs_free_extent:3054:
>>>>> errno=-5 IO failure
>>>>> [ 1398.218828] BTRFS: error (device sde) in
>>>>> btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2124: errno=-5 IO failure
>>>>> [ 1398.219002] BTRFS: error (device sde) in btrfs_replay_log:2254:
>>>>> errno=-5 IO failure (Failed to recover log tree)
>>>>> [ 1398.229048] BTRFS error (device sde): open_ctree failed
>>>>
>>>> This is because we shouldn't allow to do anything write to the fs if we
>>>> have anything wrong in extent tree.
>>>>
>>>
>>> This is happening when mounting read-only. My assumption is that it
>>> only tries to replay in memory without writing anything to disk.
>>>
>>
>> We lacks the check on log tree.
>>
>> Normally for such forced RO mount, log replay is not allowed.
>>
>> We should output a warning to prompt user to use nologreplay, and reject
>> the mount.
>>
>
> I'm not familiar with log replay but couldn't there be something
> useful (ignoring ref counts) that would still be worth replaying in
> memory?
>
Log replay means metadata write.

Any write needs a valid extent tree to find out free space for new
metadata/data.

So no, we can't do anything but completely ignoring the log.

Thanks,
Qu