linux-kernel - Re: [unixbhaskar@...il.com: [PATCH] lib: Fix a typo]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c9e9369a-1a59-8915-c28e-1d1e11e6229c@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Mar 2021 18:42:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...badil.infradead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
cc:     david@...morbit.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [unixbhaskar@...il.com: [PATCH] lib: Fix a typo]



On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:

> ----- Forwarded message from Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com> -----
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Can you please take it, as I haven't found anybody attached with this 
> file,but
> found you made some entry(I am trying to take advantage of you!! :)  ) ..
>
> Thanks,
> Bhaskar
> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 02:31:55 +0530
> From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> To: unixbhaskar@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH] lib: Fix a typo
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.2
>
>
> s/funtion/function/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>


> ---
>  lib/list_sort.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/list_sort.c b/lib/list_sort.c
> index 52f0c258c895..282fe269f16a 100644
> --- a/lib/list_sort.c
> +++ b/lib/list_sort.c
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void merge_final(void *priv, cmp_func cmp, struct 
> list_head *head,
>   * @head: the list to sort
>   * @cmp: the elements comparison function
>   *
> - * The comparison funtion @cmp must return > 0 if @a should sort after
> + * The comparison function @cmp must return > 0 if @a should sort after
>   * @b ("@a > @b" if you want an ascending sort), and <= 0 if @a should
>   * sort before @b *or* their original order should be preserved.  It is
>   * always called with the element that came first in the input in @a,
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>