[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17a49e9b-6ba6-9cca-d835-9199d92e4870@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2021 15:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...badil.infradead.org>
To: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
cc: linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com, sroland@...are.com,
zackr@...are.com, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/vmwgfx: Fix a typo
On Sun, 21 Mar 2021, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/particuar/particular/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> index 7369dd86d3a9..6cd38e407145 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_so.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> * The currently only reason we need to keep track of views is that if we
> * destroy a hardware surface, all views pointing to it must also be destroyed,
> * otherwise the device will error.
> - * So in particuar if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> + * So in particular if a surface is evicted, we must destroy all views pointing
> * to it, and all context bindings of that view. Similarly we must restore
> * the view bindings, views and surfaces pointed to by the views when a
> * context is referenced in the command stream.
> --
> 2.26.2
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists