[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADxym3ZdOiGuJUE_t0mXrUnDsvRPsNOhWx+qE3okOuf7w6NVxg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 21:29:16 +0800
From: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@....com.cn>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: socket: change MSG_CMSG_COMPAT to BIT(21)
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 8:49 PM Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
...
>
> Shouldn't you add some comment here to stop people from trying to
> use BIT(31) in the future?
>
> Thanks,
Yeah, I think it's necessary. Thank you for your reminder~
With Regards,
Menglong Dong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists