| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20210321215457.588554-10-yury.norov@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 14:54:54 -0700
From: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>, linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Jianpeng Ma <jianpeng.ma@...el.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 09/12] lib: add fast path for find_next_*_bit()
Similarly to bitmap functions, find_next_*_bit() users will benefit
if we'll handle a case of bitmaps that fit into a single word inline.
In the very best case, the compiler may replace a function call with
a few instructions.
This is the quite typical find_next_bit() user:
unsigned int cpumask_next(int n, const struct cpumask *srcp)
{
/* -1 is a legal arg here. */
if (n != -1)
cpumask_check(n);
return find_next_bit(cpumask_bits(srcp), nr_cpumask_bits, n + 1);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpumask_next);
Currently, on ARM64 the generated code looks like this:
0000000000000000 <cpumask_next>:
0: a9bf7bfd stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
4: 11000402 add w2, w0, #0x1
8: aa0103e0 mov x0, x1
c: d2800401 mov x1, #0x40 // #64
10: 910003fd mov x29, sp
14: 93407c42 sxtw x2, w2
18: 94000000 bl 0 <find_next_bit>
1c: a8c17bfd ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
20: d65f03c0 ret
24: d503201f nop
After applying this patch:
0000000000000140 <cpumask_next>:
140: 11000400 add w0, w0, #0x1
144: 93407c00 sxtw x0, w0
148: f100fc1f cmp x0, #0x3f
14c: 54000168 b.hi 178 <cpumask_next+0x38> // b.pmore
150: f9400023 ldr x3, [x1]
154: 92800001 mov x1, #0xffffffffffffffff // #-1
158: 9ac02020 lsl x0, x1, x0
15c: 52800802 mov w2, #0x40 // #64
160: 8a030001 and x1, x0, x3
164: dac00020 rbit x0, x1
168: f100003f cmp x1, #0x0
16c: dac01000 clz x0, x0
170: 1a800040 csel w0, w2, w0, eq // eq = none
174: d65f03c0 ret
178: 52800800 mov w0, #0x40 // #64
17c: d65f03c0 ret
find_next_bit() call is replaced with 6 instructions. find_next_bit()
itself is 41 instructions plus function call overhead.
Despite inlining, the scripts/bloat-o-meter report smaller .text size
after applying the series:
add/remove: 11/9 grow/shrink: 233/176 up/down: 5780/-6768 (-988)
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
---
include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h
index 7ad70dab8e93..4148c74a1e4d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/find.h
@@ -20,6 +20,16 @@ static inline
unsigned long find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
+ if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+ return size;
+
+ val = *addr & GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
+ return val ? __ffs(val) : size;
+ }
+
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, 0UL, 0);
}
#endif
@@ -40,6 +50,16 @@ unsigned long find_next_and_bit(const unsigned long *addr1,
const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
+ if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+ return size;
+
+ val = *addr1 & *addr2 & GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
+ return val ? __ffs(val) : size;
+ }
+
return _find_next_bit(addr1, addr2, size, offset, 0UL, 0);
}
#endif
@@ -58,6 +78,16 @@ static inline
unsigned long find_next_zero_bit(const unsigned long *addr, unsigned long size,
unsigned long offset)
{
+ if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+ unsigned long val;
+
+ if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+ return size;
+
+ val = *addr | ~GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
+ return val == ~0UL ? size : ffz(val);
+ }
+
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, ~0UL, 0);
}
#endif
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
index 21305f6cea0b..5a28629cbf4d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/bitops/le.h
@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
#include <asm-generic/bitops/find.h>
#include <asm/types.h>
#include <asm/byteorder.h>
+#include <linux/swab.h>
#if defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)
@@ -37,6 +38,16 @@ static inline
unsigned long find_next_zero_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long offset)
{
+ if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+ unsigned long val = *(const unsigned long *)addr;
+
+ if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+ return size;
+
+ val = swab(val) | ~GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
+ return val == ~0UL ? size : ffz(val);
+ }
+
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, ~0UL, 1);
}
#endif
@@ -46,6 +57,16 @@ static inline
unsigned long find_next_bit_le(const void *addr, unsigned
long size, unsigned long offset)
{
+ if (small_const_nbits(size)) {
+ unsigned long val = *(const unsigned long *)addr;
+
+ if (unlikely(offset >= size))
+ return size;
+
+ val = swab(val) & GENMASK(size - 1, offset);
+ return val ? __ffs(val) : size;
+ }
+
return _find_next_bit(addr, NULL, size, offset, 0UL, 1);
}
#endif
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists