[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2A4d5iKZyA_Lexmfrn02ysiXuJPk9HK6ybYFgoVWuRdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2021 12:55:24 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: arm64 syzbot instances
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 12:52 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 9:43 PM Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@...aro.org> wrote:
> https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Plug-and-Play-HOWTO-6.html#ss6.12
> states the behavior of the ISA I/O ports and how Linux drivers rely
> on that. Is that enough for you?
Actually it only mentions it very indirectly, by saying that if a present
device has 0xFF in a register, the detection may fail since it looks like
a missing device.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists