[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210322143714.494603ed@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:37:14 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree
Hi all,
After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
failed like this:
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline':
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: error: 'ideal_nops' undeclared (first use in this function)
2015 | memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:16: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2015:27: error: 'NOP_ATOMIC5' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'GFP_ATOMIC'?
2015 | memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
| GFP_ATOMIC
Caused by commit
a89dfde3dc3c ("x86: Remove dynamic NOP selection")
interacting with commit
b90829704780 ("bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG")
from the net tree.
I have applied the following merge fix patch.
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:30:37 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] x86: fix up for "bpf: Use NOP_ATOMIC5 instead of
emit_nops(&prog, 5) for BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG"
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index db50ab14df67..e2b5da5d441d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -2012,7 +2012,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
/* remember return value in a stack for bpf prog to access */
emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -8);
im->ip_after_call = prog;
- memcpy(prog, ideal_nops[NOP_ATOMIC5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
+ memcpy(prog, x86_nops[5], X86_PATCH_SIZE);
prog += X86_PATCH_SIZE;
}
--
2.30.0
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists